You can choose a password length of not more than 50 characters. Do not forget to switch keyboard layout to the English. Do not choose a password too simple, less then 4 characters, because such a password is easy to find out. Allowed latin and !@#$%^&*()_-+=., characters
Create Free Account
Already have an account? Enter
Back
Welcome back!
Please enter all the fields
Incorrect login or password entered
Sign In
Forgot your password?
Don’t have an account? Create Account
Back
Forgot your password?
Please enter your Email
This Email is not registered in Simkl
Failed to send email, try again later
Don't worry. It's easy to reset.
Please enter your Simkl username or E-mail from your account to start the password recovery process.
Reset Password
We have sent instructions to the email address you provided during signup. Please follow the link from the email to continue.
when discussing disappointing attempts to bring a classic to life, king arthur: legend of the sword may be the worst offender of that in 2017. much like ghost in the shell, the writing was on the wall for guy ritchie's disastrous retelling of the arthurian myth. for months, stories leaked about a difficult production and costly reshoots. when the film came out, it was at least easy to see where the money had gone. the bigger question was why it went there. ritchie cast his film well, at least. but charlie hunnam and the rest of the cast were handicapped by a terrible script that gave them nothing to work with. arthur isn't a compelling character here, as hard as hunnam tries. and the supporting cast are practically interchangable except jude law, having fun as the villainous vortigern.
the cast was also overshadowed by an overabundance of special effects in an attempt to give the film a blockbuster feel it didn't need. there were so many effects shots that much of the cgi suffers. the climactic end fight between arthur and the demon knight looks very much like a lesser cutscene from middle-earth: shadows of mordor. that's fine for a video game, but not for a $175 million film. there's a scant amount of fun to be had here or there, mostly thanks to the cast. but all in all, legend of the sword was little more than a costly waste of time for warner bros. and moviegoers alike.
You can paste URL of the image inside
your comment and it will be
automatically converted into the image
when reading the comment.
Find a GIF
Create a Meme
How to add a video:
To add a video paste video url directly into your comment. Example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7L2PVdrb_8.
Do not post links to copyrighted video content (TV Episodes,
Movies). Share them privately if
needed.